<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 453 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay of 637 days in filing the appeal due to the Covid-19 pandemic, admitting the appeal for adjudication on merits. It partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the revision order on the issue of rental income. The Tribunal found that the revision order on the claim of deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act was academic as the Assessment Officer had already examined the issue during limited scrutiny assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 453 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay of 637 days in filing the appeal due to the Covid-19 pandemic, admitting the appeal for adjudication on merits. It partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the revision order on the issue of rental income. The Tribunal found that the revision order on the claim of deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act was academic as the Assessment Officer had already examined the issue during limited scrutiny assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>