<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 808 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303745</link>
    <description>Cross-examination under the Evidence Act is broad, but it remains limited to relevant facts and matters affecting a witness&#039;s credit. The court may exclude irrelevant, vexatious, indecent, scandalous, or harassing questions and regulate cross-examination to prevent bullying or oppression. Questions that do not bear on the trial&#039;s subject matter or the witness&#039;s credibility may be disallowed in the court&#039;s discretion, and interlocutory regulation of cross-examination will not ordinarily be disturbed in writ jurisdiction absent manifest illegality, perversity, or miscarriage of justice. The trial court&#039;s refusal to permit the disputed questions was upheld as the questions were irrelevant and beyond the permissible scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 18:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 808 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303745</link>
      <description>Cross-examination under the Evidence Act is broad, but it remains limited to relevant facts and matters affecting a witness&#039;s credit. The court may exclude irrelevant, vexatious, indecent, scandalous, or harassing questions and regulate cross-examination to prevent bullying or oppression. Questions that do not bear on the trial&#039;s subject matter or the witness&#039;s credibility may be disallowed in the court&#039;s discretion, and interlocutory regulation of cross-examination will not ordinarily be disturbed in writ jurisdiction absent manifest illegality, perversity, or miscarriage of justice. The trial court&#039;s refusal to permit the disputed questions was upheld as the questions were irrelevant and beyond the permissible scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>