<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 263 Review: Land Division by Father Not Automatically Family Property; Lacks Legal Basis for Capital Gain Claims.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65040</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - Capital gain on property of the respective HUFs or respective individual assessee&#039;s - Merely because land is divided, with a view to avoid family dispute, by the father between himself and his two sons, would not by itself make it a family property. No case, either on facts or in law is made out. To us, it is no more than a father dividing his property, self-acquired as well as that bequeathed to him by his father, between his two sons, also retaining a part for himself (5.45 acres). In short, the claim is without basis and wholly unproved; in fact, fatuous. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 11:54:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 11:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 263 Review: Land Division by Father Not Automatically Family Property; Lacks Legal Basis for Capital Gain Claims.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65040</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - Capital gain on property of the respective HUFs or respective individual assessee&#039;s - Merely because land is divided, with a view to avoid family dispute, by the father between himself and his two sons, would not by itself make it a family property. No case, either on facts or in law is made out. To us, it is no more than a father dividing his property, self-acquired as well as that bequeathed to him by his father, between his two sons, also retaining a part for himself (5.45 acres). In short, the claim is without basis and wholly unproved; in fact, fatuous. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 11:54:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>