<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 190 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30095</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the interest payable on an excise refund was rightly deducted by the Assessing Officer and should not have been disallowed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Court determined that the interest payment was not a statutory liability but based on a High Court order, therefore not falling under Section 43B. The Court concluded that the Commissioner erred in disallowing the interest amount, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 190 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30095</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the interest payable on an excise refund was rightly deducted by the Assessing Officer and should not have been disallowed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Court determined that the interest payment was not a statutory liability but based on a High Court order, therefore not falling under Section 43B. The Court concluded that the Commissioner erred in disallowing the interest amount, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>