<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 429 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426190</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The ITAT held that the subsequent order was invalid as it was based on a previously quashed order, rendering it beyond jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of proper legal foundation for revisionary powers and the impact of prior judicial decisions on subsequent orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 429 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426190</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The ITAT held that the subsequent order was invalid as it was based on a previously quashed order, rendering it beyond jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of proper legal foundation for revisionary powers and the impact of prior judicial decisions on subsequent orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>