https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426187 A notification extending time to pronounce reserved judgments was treated as applicable only to officers who continued to hold the office and had not yet delivered their decisions. Once a new member was appointed, the earlier officer on additional charge ceased to be the competent authority for New Delhi and could not be compelled to pronounce a judgment in a matter heard earlier. The Court found no enforceable legal right or breached notification requiring a former incumbent, after leaving office, to deliver the reserved decision, and the authorities cited for the contrary view were held inapplicable on their facts. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:45:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426187 A notification extending time to pronounce reserved judgments was treated as applicable only to officers who continued to hold the office and had not yet delivered their decisions. Once a new member was appointed, the earlier officer on additional charge ceased to be the competent authority for New Delhi and could not be compelled to pronounce a judgment in a matter heard earlier. The Court found no enforceable legal right or breached notification requiring a former incumbent, after leaving office, to deliver the reserved decision, and the authorities cited for the contrary view were held inapplicable on their facts. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426187