<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 189 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit even after receiving discounts from the supplier. The Tribunal emphasized that as long as the correct duty was paid on the assessable value, trade discounts and price reductions cannot be challenged by the department. The decision centered on the interpretation of trade discounts, credit notes, and the admissibility of Cenvat credit, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 189 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit even after receiving discounts from the supplier. The Tribunal emphasized that as long as the correct duty was paid on the assessable value, trade discounts and price reductions cannot be challenged by the department. The decision centered on the interpretation of trade discounts, credit notes, and the admissibility of Cenvat credit, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>