<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30091</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim of duty amounting to Rs. 7,19,921/- paid by the appellant for goods allegedly cleared without appropriate duty payment. The appellant&#039;s argument that duty was not payable due to the exclusion of branded goods from total clearance calculation was rejected as the duty liability had been confirmed in previous orders. The tribunal held that without appealing the earlier decision on duty liability, the refund claim could not be entertained, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30091</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim of duty amounting to Rs. 7,19,921/- paid by the appellant for goods allegedly cleared without appropriate duty payment. The appellant&#039;s argument that duty was not payable due to the exclusion of branded goods from total clearance calculation was rejected as the duty liability had been confirmed in previous orders. The tribunal held that without appealing the earlier decision on duty liability, the refund claim could not be entertained, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>