<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 413 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426174</link>
    <description>A court may summon relevant evidence at any stage under Section 540 CrPC, and the power becomes mandatory where the material is essential to a just decision. In this matter, bank records and the bank official&#039;s testimony were considered necessary to determine whether the credited amount had moved from the complainant&#039;s account to the accused&#039;s account. The order summoning the records and the official was treated as a proper exercise of discretion, and the objection that it merely filled lacunae was rejected. The High Court therefore found no ground to interfere and upheld the summoning order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:44:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 413 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426174</link>
      <description>A court may summon relevant evidence at any stage under Section 540 CrPC, and the power becomes mandatory where the material is essential to a just decision. In this matter, bank records and the bank official&#039;s testimony were considered necessary to determine whether the credited amount had moved from the complainant&#039;s account to the accused&#039;s account. The order summoning the records and the official was treated as a proper exercise of discretion, and the objection that it merely filled lacunae was rejected. The High Court therefore found no ground to interfere and upheld the summoning order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>