<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 411 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426172</link>
    <description>An assessee availing the area-based exemption under Notification No. 39/2001-CE was entitled to use Cenvat credit of basic excise duty to discharge Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess. The Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra, relying on its earlier consistent decisions on the same point. On that settled view, the contrary order was unsustainable, and the credit utilisation was permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 411 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426172</link>
      <description>An assessee availing the area-based exemption under Notification No. 39/2001-CE was entitled to use Cenvat credit of basic excise duty to discharge Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess. The Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra, relying on its earlier consistent decisions on the same point. On that settled view, the contrary order was unsustainable, and the credit utilisation was permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>