<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 397 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426158</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s refund claim by extending limitation period under Section 54 of GST Act. Based on CBIC notification dated 05.07.2022, the court excluded period from March 2020 to February 2022 for computing limitation. Order-in-Appeal was set aside, and refund application was deemed timely filed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 397 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426158</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s refund claim by extending limitation period under Section 54 of GST Act. Based on CBIC notification dated 05.07.2022, the court excluded period from March 2020 to February 2022 for computing limitation. Order-in-Appeal was set aside, and refund application was deemed timely filed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>