<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 395 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426156</link>
    <description>HC addressed liability communication under DGST Act involving a tax refund of Rs.8,69,494. The court directed withdrawal of the previous order, mandated a personal hearing for the petitioner, and required the revenue authorities to issue a reasoned order. The writ petition was disposed of with specific procedural directions, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to present a defense and challenge any adverse decision through legal mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 395 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426156</link>
      <description>HC addressed liability communication under DGST Act involving a tax refund of Rs.8,69,494. The court directed withdrawal of the previous order, mandated a personal hearing for the petitioner, and required the revenue authorities to issue a reasoned order. The writ petition was disposed of with specific procedural directions, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to present a defense and challenge any adverse decision through legal mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>