https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303738 The Supreme Court concluded that the judgment in Nagaraj does not require referral to a larger Bench. The requirement for the State to collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of SCs and STs was deemed invalid as it contradicts the Indra Sawhney (1) judgment. The creamy layer principle was upheld as valid and applicable to SCs and STs to ensure reservation benefits reach the most disadvantaged members. States must collect quantifiable data to demonstrate inadequate representation in promotional posts, subject to judicial review. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 21:07:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303738 The Supreme Court concluded that the judgment in Nagaraj does not require referral to a larger Bench. The requirement for the State to collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of SCs and STs was deemed invalid as it contradicts the Indra Sawhney (1) judgment. The creamy layer principle was upheld as valid and applicable to SCs and STs to ensure reservation benefits reach the most disadvantaged members. States must collect quantifiable data to demonstrate inadequate representation in promotional posts, subject to judicial review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303738