https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303722 Interest on solatium was treated as a statutory component linked to land acquisition compensation, and the authority was required to examine and quantify the claim where interest is otherwise payable under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act. The writ court could compel performance of that statutory duty, but it should not determine entitlement or quantification in the first instance. The matter was therefore remitted to the Special Land Acquisition Officer for decision, leaving the merits of the claim open for determination by the statutory authority. en-us Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:55:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303722 Interest on solatium was treated as a statutory component linked to land acquisition compensation, and the authority was required to examine and quantify the claim where interest is otherwise payable under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act. The writ court could compel performance of that statutory duty, but it should not determine entitlement or quantification in the first instance. The matter was therefore remitted to the Special Land Acquisition Officer for decision, leaving the merits of the claim open for determination by the statutory authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303722