https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303720 Withdrawal from acquisition under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was held impermissible where the land had remained with the acquiring authority after the award and the issue had already been settled on materially identical facts. The Court treated the present matter as indistinguishable from the earlier decision concerning the adjoining plot and rejected any contrary stand based on a later withdrawal order. As the withdrawal failed, the petitioners' entitlement to the common award amount survived, and fairness required equal treatment with similarly situated landholders. The respondents were directed to release the awarded compensation with statutory interest. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:22:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303720 Withdrawal from acquisition under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was held impermissible where the land had remained with the acquiring authority after the award and the issue had already been settled on materially identical facts. The Court treated the present matter as indistinguishable from the earlier decision concerning the adjoining plot and rejected any contrary stand based on a later withdrawal order. As the withdrawal failed, the petitioners' entitlement to the common award amount survived, and fairness required equal treatment with similarly situated landholders. The respondents were directed to release the awarded compensation with statutory interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303720