<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 369 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426130</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition directing respondent to release bank accounts and property. The court found that provisional attachment orders exceeded the one-year limit under Section 83 of CGST Act, 2017. Respondent was instructed to lift attachment and inform concerned bank within three days. Petition for quashing attachment orders was withdrawn by petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 369 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426130</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition directing respondent to release bank accounts and property. The court found that provisional attachment orders exceeded the one-year limit under Section 83 of CGST Act, 2017. Respondent was instructed to lift attachment and inform concerned bank within three days. Petition for quashing attachment orders was withdrawn by petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>