<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 349 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction for employees&#039; contributions to PF and ESI as they were paid before the due date for filing the return. It disallowed the deduction of interest on delayed payment of TDS, following the Madras High Court&#039;s precedent. The Tribunal reaffirmed that amendments to tax provisions are generally prospective and distinguished between compensatory and penal interest, with the latter not being deductible as a business expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 349 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction for employees&#039; contributions to PF and ESI as they were paid before the due date for filing the return. It disallowed the deduction of interest on delayed payment of TDS, following the Madras High Court&#039;s precedent. The Tribunal reaffirmed that amendments to tax provisions are generally prospective and distinguished between compensatory and penal interest, with the latter not being deductible as a business expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>