<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 116 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30078</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on canteen bills was treated as admissible input service credit because providing canteen facilities was a statutory requirement and a coordinate bench had already approved credit on the same issue. Applying that prior view, the Tribunal held that the tax paid on canteen services formed part of eligible input service credit and could not be denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 116 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30078</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on canteen bills was treated as admissible input service credit because providing canteen facilities was a statutory requirement and a coordinate bench had already approved credit on the same issue. Applying that prior view, the Tribunal held that the tax paid on canteen services formed part of eligible input service credit and could not be denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>