https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426100 The Court sought clarification from the Department regarding the exigibility of Extra Clear Float Glass for Anti-Dumping Duty, considering its potential impact on industry units. The petitioner challenged the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing its adverse effects on the industry's economics. The Court noted Notification MTR Case No.1 of 2020, suggesting that Extra Clear Float Glass should not be excluded from Anti-Dumping Duty consideration, leading to further examination of the matter. Further proceedings are scheduled for 05.08.2022 pending the Department's affidavit clarifying its stance and intended actions. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:10:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426100 The Court sought clarification from the Department regarding the exigibility of Extra Clear Float Glass for Anti-Dumping Duty, considering its potential impact on industry units. The petitioner challenged the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing its adverse effects on the industry's economics. The Court noted Notification MTR Case No.1 of 2020, suggesting that Extra Clear Float Glass should not be excluded from Anti-Dumping Duty consideration, leading to further examination of the matter. Further proceedings are scheduled for 05.08.2022 pending the Department's affidavit clarifying its stance and intended actions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426100