<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 337 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Appellant on all issues, concluding that the proceedings were unduly delayed, the imported material was transshipped and utilized for manufacturing export goods, and there was no suppression of the second factory&#039;s existence. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2022 21:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 337 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Appellant on all issues, concluding that the proceedings were unduly delayed, the imported material was transshipped and utilized for manufacturing export goods, and there was no suppression of the second factory&#039;s existence. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>