<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 79 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for a refund of excess service tax payment, recognizing the applicability of the doctrine of merger and the eligibility for the refund claim based on the input cost nature of the service tax paid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legal arguments and precedents cited, leading to the allowance of the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 79 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for a refund of excess service tax payment, recognizing the applicability of the doctrine of merger and the eligibility for the refund claim based on the input cost nature of the service tax paid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legal arguments and precedents cited, leading to the allowance of the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>