https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426091 A proceeding instituted in the name of an individual, although the party was in fact running a proprietorship concern, was treated as lacking candour and proper maintainability. The Tribunal held that the statutory scheme permits appearance only through specified authorised persons, and the pleadings were signed and filed by someone who was neither an advocate nor otherwise within the permitted category. That defect went to the competence of both the information before the Commission and the appeal before the Tribunal, so the matter was dismissed at the threshold without examining the competition-law merits, with costs imposed on the appellant. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:09:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426091 A proceeding instituted in the name of an individual, although the party was in fact running a proprietorship concern, was treated as lacking candour and proper maintainability. The Tribunal held that the statutory scheme permits appearance only through specified authorised persons, and the pleadings were signed and filed by someone who was neither an advocate nor otherwise within the permitted category. That defect went to the competence of both the information before the Commission and the appeal before the Tribunal, so the matter was dismissed at the threshold without examining the competition-law merits, with costs imposed on the appellant. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426091