<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 327 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426088</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble Apex Court affirmed that the debt owed by the Corporate Debtor to the Financial Creditor qualified as a &quot;financial debt&quot; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The balance sheets acknowledged the debt, extending the limitation period. The application under Section 7 of IBC was deemed timely filed. The principle of res judicata barred the Appellants from re-agitating issues. No irregularities were found in the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of both appeals. The Tribunal upheld the previous findings, emphasizing finality in litigation and preventing abuse of the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 327 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426088</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble Apex Court affirmed that the debt owed by the Corporate Debtor to the Financial Creditor qualified as a &quot;financial debt&quot; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The balance sheets acknowledged the debt, extending the limitation period. The application under Section 7 of IBC was deemed timely filed. The principle of res judicata barred the Appellants from re-agitating issues. No irregularities were found in the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of both appeals. The Tribunal upheld the previous findings, emphasizing finality in litigation and preventing abuse of the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>