<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 26 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30075</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, in a case concerning the taxability of technology transfer agreements, ruled in favor of the Appellant. The Tribunal held that the agreement for the transfer of patented technology and brand name did not constitute receiving engineering consultancy services and therefore was not subject to service tax. The Tribunal overturned the order demanding service tax and penalty from the Appellant, deeming it unsustainable. The decision was delivered by Member (T) Rakesh Kumar on 17/07/2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 26 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30075</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, in a case concerning the taxability of technology transfer agreements, ruled in favor of the Appellant. The Tribunal held that the agreement for the transfer of patented technology and brand name did not constitute receiving engineering consultancy services and therefore was not subject to service tax. The Tribunal overturned the order demanding service tax and penalty from the Appellant, deeming it unsustainable. The decision was delivered by Member (T) Rakesh Kumar on 17/07/2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>