<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 314 - CESTATE MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s admission discretion may be exercised to refuse an appeal where the disputed demand and penalty fall below the monetary threshold under section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Repeated non-appearance by the appellant also supports dismissal for default under the Tribunal&#039;s procedural rules, subject to restoration on sufficient cause. On the stated facts, the appeal was not admitted and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 314 - CESTATE MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s admission discretion may be exercised to refuse an appeal where the disputed demand and penalty fall below the monetary threshold under section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Repeated non-appearance by the appellant also supports dismissal for default under the Tribunal&#039;s procedural rules, subject to restoration on sufficient cause. On the stated facts, the appeal was not admitted and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>