<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 304 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426065</link>
    <description>An appeal against acquittal under the NDPS Act was not interfered with because the trial court&#039;s view was neither perverse nor illegal. Serious investigative and prosecutorial lapses remained: inconsistencies on the raid, missing search-warrant and raid records, unclear sealing and custody of the seized contraband, no proof of sample forwarding for forensic testing, and independent witnesses who did not support the prosecution. The official evidence also left material gaps on recovery and seizure. Applying the settled standard that an acquittal will be disturbed only where the trial court&#039;s reasoning is manifestly erroneous, the court held that the prosecution had failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and upheld the acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 304 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426065</link>
      <description>An appeal against acquittal under the NDPS Act was not interfered with because the trial court&#039;s view was neither perverse nor illegal. Serious investigative and prosecutorial lapses remained: inconsistencies on the raid, missing search-warrant and raid records, unclear sealing and custody of the seized contraband, no proof of sample forwarding for forensic testing, and independent witnesses who did not support the prosecution. The official evidence also left material gaps on recovery and seizure. Applying the settled standard that an acquittal will be disturbed only where the trial court&#039;s reasoning is manifestly erroneous, the court held that the prosecution had failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and upheld the acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>