https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303710 Consistent and corroborated eyewitness evidence, together with the accused's refusal to join the test identification parade and the explained delay in lodging the FIR, supported the findings of guilt for robbery with hurt and the allied Arms Act offence, so the appellate court found no basis to reappraise the evidence and upheld the conviction. Belated pleas of juvenility and unsoundness of mind also failed because they were unsupported by reliable proof, such as birth, school, medical, or expert records, and the accused's conduct and section 313 answers reinforced rejection of the defence. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:12:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303710 Consistent and corroborated eyewitness evidence, together with the accused's refusal to join the test identification parade and the explained delay in lodging the FIR, supported the findings of guilt for robbery with hurt and the allied Arms Act offence, so the appellate court found no basis to reappraise the evidence and upheld the conviction. Belated pleas of juvenility and unsoundness of mind also failed because they were unsupported by reliable proof, such as birth, school, medical, or expert records, and the accused's conduct and section 313 answers reinforced rejection of the defence. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303710