https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303708 The Tribunal's power under the 1993 Act was questioned where it directed that a bank's complaint letter be treated as withdrawn, because that relief was viewed as a final order on a matter arguably outside the adjudicatory field under Section 17. Prima facie, Section 19(25) was not read as extending jurisdiction to grant relief beyond the statutory scope of adjudication, and the prior disposal of the deletion and cancellation application strengthened the jurisdictional objection. The appellate affirmation was said to have overlooked that objection, so the bank was found to have an arguable case and the withdrawal direction was stayed for three weeks. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:12:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303708 The Tribunal's power under the 1993 Act was questioned where it directed that a bank's complaint letter be treated as withdrawn, because that relief was viewed as a final order on a matter arguably outside the adjudicatory field under Section 17. Prima facie, Section 19(25) was not read as extending jurisdiction to grant relief beyond the statutory scope of adjudication, and the prior disposal of the deletion and cancellation application strengthened the jurisdictional objection. The appellate affirmation was said to have overlooked that objection, so the bank was found to have an arguable case and the withdrawal direction was stayed for three weeks. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303708