<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1274 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, finding the original assessment erroneous for allowing a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest earned from banks. The Tribunal ruled that such interest income should be taxed under &quot;Income from Other Sources&quot; and not as business profits eligible for deduction. The assessment was set aside for reassessment by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1274 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, finding the original assessment erroneous for allowing a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest earned from banks. The Tribunal ruled that such interest income should be taxed under &quot;Income from Other Sources&quot; and not as business profits eligible for deduction. The assessment was set aside for reassessment by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>