<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426059</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to the abortion rules could be examined, but interim relief could not extend beyond the statutory scheme until the rule was declared ultra vires. The rule allowing termination up to twenty-four weeks applied only to specified categories of women, and an unmarried woman with a consensual pregnancy did not fall within those categories. Because the pregnancy had crossed the ordinary statutory limit and the requested interim order would effectively grant the final relief sought, the Court declined to move beyond the statute. Interim permission for termination was therefore refused and the application dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426059</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to the abortion rules could be examined, but interim relief could not extend beyond the statutory scheme until the rule was declared ultra vires. The rule allowing termination up to twenty-four weeks applied only to specified categories of women, and an unmarried woman with a consensual pregnancy did not fall within those categories. Because the pregnancy had crossed the ordinary statutory limit and the requested interim order would effectively grant the final relief sought, the Court declined to move beyond the statute. Interim permission for termination was therefore refused and the application dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>