<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 181 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30069</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce the Redemption Fine and Penalty based on the application of previous Tribunal rulings on similar cases involving old and used goods. The rejection of the Revenue appeals was justified by the consistency in fixing RF and penalty percentages for comparable imported items, as established by earlier judgments and the acceptance of the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on identical matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 181 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30069</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce the Redemption Fine and Penalty based on the application of previous Tribunal rulings on similar cases involving old and used goods. The rejection of the Revenue appeals was justified by the consistency in fixing RF and penalty percentages for comparable imported items, as established by earlier judgments and the acceptance of the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on identical matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>