<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 297 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 64,62,054/- under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s failure to provide evidence and explanations regarding fresh deposits, as required by Section 68. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) acted within the scope of directions and confirmed the addition, emphasizing the lack of compliance by the assessee throughout the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 297 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 64,62,054/- under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s failure to provide evidence and explanations regarding fresh deposits, as required by Section 68. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) acted within the scope of directions and confirmed the addition, emphasizing the lack of compliance by the assessee throughout the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>