<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 262 - HIGH COURT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30064</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit could not be denied solely for non-filing of a declaration under Rule 57-G where the facts matched an earlier Supreme Court ruling and the assessee had paid duty under protest while disputing liability. The High Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on that precedent and found no distinguishable facts or substantial legal issue arising from the Revenue&#039;s reference request. On that basis, no referable question of law was shown, and the Revenue was not entitled to require the Tribunal to state the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 262 - HIGH COURT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30064</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit could not be denied solely for non-filing of a declaration under Rule 57-G where the facts matched an earlier Supreme Court ruling and the assessee had paid duty under protest while disputing liability. The High Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on that precedent and found no distinguishable facts or substantial legal issue arising from the Revenue&#039;s reference request. On that basis, no referable question of law was shown, and the Revenue was not entitled to require the Tribunal to state the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>