<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to admit additional evidence and partially allow the appeal. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 3,11,30,000 and confirmed the addition of Rs. 8,00,000 related to two unverified shareholders. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was supported by a detailed verification process during the remand proceedings, with the Tribunal finding no fault in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2022 09:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to admit additional evidence and partially allow the appeal. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 3,11,30,000 and confirmed the addition of Rs. 8,00,000 related to two unverified shareholders. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was supported by a detailed verification process during the remand proceedings, with the Tribunal finding no fault in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>