https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426015 The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263, holding that the Pr. CIT cannot enlarge the scope of limited scrutiny. The original assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) was sustained, emphasizing adherence to CBDT instructions and the limited scope of scrutiny. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT's order. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Aug 2022 09:27:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426015 The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263, holding that the Pr. CIT cannot enlarge the scope of limited scrutiny. The original assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) was sustained, emphasizing adherence to CBDT instructions and the limited scope of scrutiny. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT's order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426015