https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303692 Interim protection was granted in a company control dispute where the applicant showed a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the existing position. The Tribunal noted that the rival group's entitlement to control the holding structure was already under challenge before the UK court, and the foreign arbitral award relied on by the respondents had not yet been enforced by the Madras High Court. The respondents were restrained from acting upon or giving effect to the resolutions passed at the extraordinary general meeting until disposal of the company petition. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2022 20:59:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303692 Interim protection was granted in a company control dispute where the applicant showed a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the existing position. The Tribunal noted that the rival group's entitlement to control the holding structure was already under challenge before the UK court, and the foreign arbitral award relied on by the respondents had not yet been enforced by the Madras High Court. The respondents were restrained from acting upon or giving effect to the resolutions passed at the extraordinary general meeting until disposal of the company petition. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303692