<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1673 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303690</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reviewed a case where the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) set aside an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) regarding the reasons for passing an interim order to regulate company affairs. The Court found that the NCLAT did not adequately address crucial aspects, leading to the appeal being allowed. The NCLAT was directed to decide the appeal promptly, with parties allowed to present arguments based on materials submitted before the NCLT. The main proceedings before the NCLT were stayed pending the NCLAT&#039;s decision on the interim order&#039;s justifiability, emphasizing the need to assess circumstances for granting such orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 20:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1673 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303690</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reviewed a case where the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) set aside an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) regarding the reasons for passing an interim order to regulate company affairs. The Court found that the NCLAT did not adequately address crucial aspects, leading to the appeal being allowed. The NCLAT was directed to decide the appeal promptly, with parties allowed to present arguments based on materials submitted before the NCLT. The main proceedings before the NCLT were stayed pending the NCLAT&#039;s decision on the interim order&#039;s justifiability, emphasizing the need to assess circumstances for granting such orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>