https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303685 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, amending the sale proclamation to exclude the palace building from the property sale based on the interpretation of the mortgage-deed. Applying the principle of ejusdem generis, the court found that the palace buildings could not be categorized with the items enumerated in the document. Despite legal precedents presuming inclusion of such buildings, the court identified an intention to exclude the zemindar's residence. The objections to the sale terms were dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs, concluding the judgment on property description and deed interpretation. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:20:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303685 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, amending the sale proclamation to exclude the palace building from the property sale based on the interpretation of the mortgage-deed. Applying the principle of ejusdem generis, the court found that the palace buildings could not be categorized with the items enumerated in the document. Despite legal precedents presuming inclusion of such buildings, the court identified an intention to exclude the zemindar's residence. The objections to the sale terms were dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs, concluding the judgment on property description and deed interpretation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303685