https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426000 The High Court considered whether time for deposit of the balance customs duty could be extended in exercise of inherent jurisdiction and whether interim anticipatory bail should be confirmed. It extended the time for payment of the remaining amount up to 30.11.2022, taking into account that a substantial part of the assessed liability had already been paid, while preserving the trial court's power to pass further orders if default continued. It also confirmed interim anticipatory bail, holding that custodial interrogation was not warranted in view of the partial payment and the petitioner's undertaking to cooperate, join investigation, and comply with bail conditions. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2022 08:56:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426000 The High Court considered whether time for deposit of the balance customs duty could be extended in exercise of inherent jurisdiction and whether interim anticipatory bail should be confirmed. It extended the time for payment of the remaining amount up to 30.11.2022, taking into account that a substantial part of the assessed liability had already been paid, while preserving the trial court's power to pass further orders if default continued. It also confirmed interim anticipatory bail, holding that custodial interrogation was not warranted in view of the partial payment and the petitioner's undertaking to cooperate, join investigation, and comply with bail conditions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426000