<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1429 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303683</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order regarding a property transaction discrepancy. The court found no breach of natural justice, noting the assessment was based on provided documents. The petitioner was advised to appeal to the Appellate Commissioner within 30 days and could seek a stay on recovery proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the statutory appeal process for relief, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1429 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303683</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order regarding a property transaction discrepancy. The court found no breach of natural justice, noting the assessment was based on provided documents. The petitioner was advised to appeal to the Appellate Commissioner within 30 days and could seek a stay on recovery proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the statutory appeal process for relief, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>