https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303674 The court upheld the validity of Conditions No. 4 and 5 in the e-tender notice, ruling that they were not arbitrary or favoring specific bidders. It found that the conditions were in compliance with Central Vigilance Commission guidelines and did not violate any legal standards. The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters and dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner failed to prove any arbitrariness or unfairness in the tender conditions. The final order resulted in the dismissal of the writ petition and accompanying application. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2022 20:31:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303674 The court upheld the validity of Conditions No. 4 and 5 in the e-tender notice, ruling that they were not arbitrary or favoring specific bidders. It found that the conditions were in compliance with Central Vigilance Commission guidelines and did not violate any legal standards. The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters and dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner failed to prove any arbitrariness or unfairness in the tender conditions. The final order resulted in the dismissal of the writ petition and accompanying application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303674