https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303671 Bail was granted in a case involving recovery of a commercial quantity of charas after the Court considered the Section 37 NDPS restrictions and the material against the applicant. The applicant had remained in custody for nearly two years, had no prior criminal history, and was described as a helper on the vehicle with a limited role. Without entering into the merits, the Court noted the rival contentions on the Section 67 statement and found that the twin requirements under Section 37 appeared to be satisfied, also taking into account that bail had been granted to a co-accused. The applicant was therefore entitled to bail. en-us Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2022 20:31:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303671 Bail was granted in a case involving recovery of a commercial quantity of charas after the Court considered the Section 37 NDPS restrictions and the material against the applicant. The applicant had remained in custody for nearly two years, had no prior criminal history, and was described as a helper on the vehicle with a limited role. Without entering into the merits, the Court noted the rival contentions on the Section 67 statement and found that the twin requirements under Section 37 appeared to be satisfied, also taking into account that bail had been granted to a co-accused. The applicant was therefore entitled to bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303671