<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2068 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303670</link>
    <description>The HC of Bombay rejected the review petition seeking modification of an order directing respondent No.1 to disburse retiral and monetary benefits to the original petitioner, despite reservations expressed by the petitioners about the entitlement of the original petitioner. The court found the review petition devoid of substance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 20:31:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2068 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303670</link>
      <description>The HC of Bombay rejected the review petition seeking modification of an order directing respondent No.1 to disburse retiral and monetary benefits to the original petitioner, despite reservations expressed by the petitioners about the entitlement of the original petitioner. The court found the review petition devoid of substance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>