https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425968 The Court set aside the assessment orders for the years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 due to violations of natural justice principles. It found that the petitioner was not given adequate opportunity to respond to show cause notices, leading to ex-parte orders. The Assessing Officer's errors in assessing property purchase details were noted, with insufficient explanations from the petitioner. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for proper assessment following due procedures, granting the petitioner four weeks to respond. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs incurred. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2022 08:34:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425968 The Court set aside the assessment orders for the years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 due to violations of natural justice principles. It found that the petitioner was not given adequate opportunity to respond to show cause notices, leading to ex-parte orders. The Assessing Officer's errors in assessing property purchase details were noted, with insufficient explanations from the petitioner. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for proper assessment following due procedures, granting the petitioner four weeks to respond. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs incurred. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425968