<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 203 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax credit disallowance case. It held that the adjustment made by CPC without issuing notice to the assessee was not sustainable under section 143(1)(a). Additionally, the AO&#039;s disallowance of tax credit due to non-disclosure of corresponding income was overturned as the CIT (A) failed to consider the presented facts. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process and proper consideration of facts in tax assessments, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 203 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax credit disallowance case. It held that the adjustment made by CPC without issuing notice to the assessee was not sustainable under section 143(1)(a). Additionally, the AO&#039;s disallowance of tax credit due to non-disclosure of corresponding income was overturned as the CIT (A) failed to consider the presented facts. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process and proper consideration of facts in tax assessments, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>