<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, finding a nexus between undisclosed income and investments made by the assessee and its partners. The Tribunal determined that the undisclosed income disclosed before the Settlement Commission was linked to the investments, leading to a favorable decision for the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis emphasized the importance of establishing this connection, ultimately resulting in a ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, finding a nexus between undisclosed income and investments made by the assessee and its partners. The Tribunal determined that the undisclosed income disclosed before the Settlement Commission was linked to the investments, leading to a favorable decision for the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis emphasized the importance of establishing this connection, ultimately resulting in a ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>