https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425931 Provisional attachment of bank accounts under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was treated as a matter to be pursued before the adjudicating authority once proceedings were already pending there. The writ petition was not used to bypass the statutory attachment process, and the petitioner was directed to raise all objections, including the validity of attachment, before that forum. At the same time, limited operational relief was preserved by permitting account operations only in respect of amounts deposited on or after the date of communication of the order. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2022 08:33:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425931 Provisional attachment of bank accounts under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was treated as a matter to be pursued before the adjudicating authority once proceedings were already pending there. The writ petition was not used to bypass the statutory attachment process, and the petitioner was directed to raise all objections, including the validity of attachment, before that forum. At the same time, limited operational relief was preserved by permitting account operations only in respect of amounts deposited on or after the date of communication of the order. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425931