https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425930 The court upheld the respondents' actions in issuing a Look Out Circular (LOC) and cancelling the petitioner's passport, citing national interest and economic security justifications. The petitioner's request to quash the LOC and travel back to the Netherlands was denied, as the ongoing money laundering investigation involving his brother required his presence in India. The court found no violation of the petitioner's fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, advising him to cooperate with the investigation to potentially withdraw the LOC. The writ petition was rejected, and the petitioner was instructed to demonstrate his non-involvement in the criminal case. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2022 08:33:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425930 The court upheld the respondents' actions in issuing a Look Out Circular (LOC) and cancelling the petitioner's passport, citing national interest and economic security justifications. The petitioner's request to quash the LOC and travel back to the Netherlands was denied, as the ongoing money laundering investigation involving his brother required his presence in India. The court found no violation of the petitioner's fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, advising him to cooperate with the investigation to potentially withdraw the LOC. The writ petition was rejected, and the petitioner was instructed to demonstrate his non-involvement in the criminal case. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425930