https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425922 The tribunal held that jurisdiction is determined by the location where the impugned order was passed. As the order was issued in Delhi, the appeals should be filed before the Delhi Bench of CESTAT. The appellant's argument based on the import location was rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The tribunal emphasized the importance of the order's location in determining jurisdiction, following precedent and relevant case law. en-us Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425922 The tribunal held that jurisdiction is determined by the location where the impugned order was passed. As the order was issued in Delhi, the appeals should be filed before the Delhi Bench of CESTAT. The appellant's argument based on the import location was rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The tribunal emphasized the importance of the order's location in determining jurisdiction, following precedent and relevant case law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425922