<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 160 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425921</link>
    <description>&quot;Chuni&quot;, a by-product of pulses used in cattle feed, was held not to fall within Entry 66 as cattle feed for entry tax purposes because the charging entry had to be construed strictly. The Orissa HC treated chuni as husk or dal by-product rather than a finished marketable cattle-feed product, and declined to apply a liberal interpretation drawn from exemption cases to enlarge the scope of the taxing entry. Section 26 reinforced that only a finished product was taxable, and the trade parlance test also pointed away from treating plain chuni as cattle feed. The revision petitions were dismissed, leaving the assessee outside entry tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 160 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425921</link>
      <description>&quot;Chuni&quot;, a by-product of pulses used in cattle feed, was held not to fall within Entry 66 as cattle feed for entry tax purposes because the charging entry had to be construed strictly. The Orissa HC treated chuni as husk or dal by-product rather than a finished marketable cattle-feed product, and declined to apply a liberal interpretation drawn from exemption cases to enlarge the scope of the taxing entry. Section 26 reinforced that only a finished product was taxable, and the trade parlance test also pointed away from treating plain chuni as cattle feed. The revision petitions were dismissed, leaving the assessee outside entry tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>